mirror of
https://gitee.com/wanwujie/deer-flow
synced 2026-04-13 18:24:45 +08:00
* refactor: extract shared utils to break harness→app cross-layer imports Move _validate_skill_frontmatter to src/skills/validation.py and CONVERTIBLE_EXTENSIONS + convert_file_to_markdown to src/utils/file_conversion.py. This eliminates the two reverse dependencies from client.py (harness layer) into gateway/routers/ (app layer), preparing for the harness/app package split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor: split backend/src into harness (deerflow.*) and app (app.*) Physically split the monolithic backend/src/ package into two layers: - **Harness** (`packages/harness/deerflow/`): publishable agent framework package with import prefix `deerflow.*`. Contains agents, sandbox, tools, models, MCP, skills, config, and all core infrastructure. - **App** (`app/`): unpublished application code with import prefix `app.*`. Contains gateway (FastAPI REST API) and channels (IM integrations). Key changes: - Move 13 harness modules to packages/harness/deerflow/ via git mv - Move gateway + channels to app/ via git mv - Rename all imports: src.* → deerflow.* (harness) / app.* (app layer) - Set up uv workspace with deerflow-harness as workspace member - Update langgraph.json, config.example.yaml, all scripts, Docker files - Add build-system (hatchling) to harness pyproject.toml - Add PYTHONPATH=. to gateway startup commands for app.* resolution - Update ruff.toml with known-first-party for import sorting - Update all documentation to reflect new directory structure Boundary rule enforced: harness code never imports from app. All 429 tests pass. Lint clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: add harness→app boundary check test and update docs Add test_harness_boundary.py that scans all Python files in packages/harness/deerflow/ and fails if any `from app.*` or `import app.*` statement is found. This enforces the architectural rule that the harness layer never depends on the app layer. Update CLAUDE.md to document the harness/app split architecture, import conventions, and the boundary enforcement test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat: add config versioning with auto-upgrade on startup When config.example.yaml schema changes, developers' local config.yaml files can silently become outdated. This adds a config_version field and auto-upgrade mechanism so breaking changes (like src.* → deerflow.* renames) are applied automatically before services start. - Add config_version: 1 to config.example.yaml - Add startup version check warning in AppConfig.from_file() - Add scripts/config-upgrade.sh with migration registry for value replacements - Add `make config-upgrade` target - Auto-run config-upgrade in serve.sh and start-daemon.sh before starting services - Add config error hints in service failure messages Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix comments * fix: update src.* import in test_sandbox_tools_security to deerflow.* Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: handle empty config and search parent dirs for config.example.yaml Address Copilot review comments on PR #1131: - Guard against yaml.safe_load() returning None for empty config files - Search parent directories for config.example.yaml instead of only looking next to config.yaml, fixing detection in common setups Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: correct skills root path depth and config_version type coercion - loader.py: fix get_skills_root_path() to use 5 parent levels (was 3) after harness split, file lives at packages/harness/deerflow/skills/ so parent×3 resolved to backend/packages/harness/ instead of backend/ - app_config.py: coerce config_version to int() before comparison in _check_config_version() to prevent TypeError when YAML stores value as string (e.g. config_version: "1") - tests: add regression tests for both fixes Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: update test imports from src.* to deerflow.*/app.* after harness refactor Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
56 lines
2.6 KiB
Python
56 lines
2.6 KiB
Python
from typing import Literal
|
|
|
|
from langchain.tools import tool
|
|
|
|
|
|
@tool("ask_clarification", parse_docstring=True, return_direct=True)
|
|
def ask_clarification_tool(
|
|
question: str,
|
|
clarification_type: Literal[
|
|
"missing_info",
|
|
"ambiguous_requirement",
|
|
"approach_choice",
|
|
"risk_confirmation",
|
|
"suggestion",
|
|
],
|
|
context: str | None = None,
|
|
options: list[str] | None = None,
|
|
) -> str:
|
|
"""Ask the user for clarification when you need more information to proceed.
|
|
|
|
Use this tool when you encounter situations where you cannot proceed without user input:
|
|
|
|
- **Missing information**: Required details not provided (e.g., file paths, URLs, specific requirements)
|
|
- **Ambiguous requirements**: Multiple valid interpretations exist
|
|
- **Approach choices**: Several valid approaches exist and you need user preference
|
|
- **Risky operations**: Destructive actions that need explicit confirmation (e.g., deleting files, modifying production)
|
|
- **Suggestions**: You have a recommendation but want user approval before proceeding
|
|
|
|
The execution will be interrupted and the question will be presented to the user.
|
|
Wait for the user's response before continuing.
|
|
|
|
When to use ask_clarification:
|
|
- You need information that wasn't provided in the user's request
|
|
- The requirement can be interpreted in multiple ways
|
|
- Multiple valid implementation approaches exist
|
|
- You're about to perform a potentially dangerous operation
|
|
- You have a recommendation but need user approval
|
|
|
|
Best practices:
|
|
- Ask ONE clarification at a time for clarity
|
|
- Be specific and clear in your question
|
|
- Don't make assumptions when clarification is needed
|
|
- For risky operations, ALWAYS ask for confirmation
|
|
- After calling this tool, execution will be interrupted automatically
|
|
|
|
Args:
|
|
question: The clarification question to ask the user. Be specific and clear.
|
|
clarification_type: The type of clarification needed (missing_info, ambiguous_requirement, approach_choice, risk_confirmation, suggestion).
|
|
context: Optional context explaining why clarification is needed. Helps the user understand the situation.
|
|
options: Optional list of choices (for approach_choice or suggestion types). Present clear options for the user to choose from.
|
|
"""
|
|
# This is a placeholder implementation
|
|
# The actual logic is handled by ClarificationMiddleware which intercepts this tool call
|
|
# and interrupts execution to present the question to the user
|
|
return "Clarification request processed by middleware"
|